i've been neglecting my yoga practice the last couple weeks. my regular yoga teachers i go to, the only ones i have found in austin i thoroughly enjoy and agree with, are out for a little while having a baby (they're married). although i am thrilled about them becoming new parents, i miss them in class!
yesterday was the first time i've been to yoga in two weeks, i hate to admit. i knew there would be a sub for ben's class last night, but i went anyway and gave her the benefit of the doubt. the class started out quite nice, actually - we eased into it, did some breathing work, had some opening meditation, so it was starting to look good. so far, so good. then within 10 minutes it turned into a fast flow aerobics type class with music so loud i could barely hear the teacher. i was annoyed the rest of the class, left irritated, and didn't get anything from it.
now, i know that there are many people out there that like this type of class. it's fast, you get a good aerobic 'work-out', you like the music, etc. americans tend to like the westernized version of yoga. but this kind of yoga is absolutely nothing like the original yoga that began years and years ago in other parts of the world - it's not even reminiscent of it. did you know the original yoga only had a handful of postures and every single one of them was seated? did you know the original yoga used to include practices such as deep meditation, different breathing techniques, ayurvedic medicinal practices, and using a neti pot? yep - that's right.
my training came from a lesser known branch of the yoga tree - i think most teachers these days are trained in flow vinyasa, some type of core power yoga, more popular aerobic type yoga, etc. i was trained by a student whose grand-teacher is pandit rajmani, who is the successor of swami rama. i was trained more in trantric (not the sex kind - get your mind out of the gutter) hatha yoga, more similar to the original style of yoga. it's a slow, deep practice. you hold a posture for several breath cycles to maximize the physical, mental, and spiritual benefit of each. there is an emphasis on pranayama (breathing exercises), meditation, and rest. i felt changed forever after my in depth teacher training. the readings, the teachings, the practice, the overall knowledge i got is forever embedded into my heart. since this is a less popular branch of the yoga tree, it is hard to find teachers who i agree and connect with - in fact, there isn't one yoga teacher i know of (and i searched) in austin who is apart of this branch.
these two teachers i have found in austin are amazing - they fall pretty in sync with how i was taught and how i like to practice. i've been disconnected and disappointed with other teachers i have found. i get far more physical benefits from hilly and ben's classes - we hold deep poses for a few breath cycles instead of flowing quickly with each breath. i feel stronger when i practice with them than i have felt with anyone else. sure, you don't get as an aerobic work-out as other classes you may find, but again - yoga isn't meant to be a work-out, and instead is more of a work-in. a little while ago, i was leaving one of hilly's classes and a woman who was in class with me (who i didn't know) let out a huge sigh and said to me, 'now that is what a yoga class should be.' she went on to say that when she wants more of a calorie-burner and work-out she goes to other classes, but with hilly's class she always feels so well rested and calm after. i couldn't agree more, stranger - i couldn't agree more.
i have left two yoga classes before. a couple years ago, not only did i leave this class, but i left the studio entirely. i had began teacher training myself, and as i delved deeper into my own practice and felt more in line with what i was learning from shanon, i felt more and more disconnected to my usual classes that i used to like. my teacher's teacher rod stryker has a saying that rang true, 'give them what they want, and then slip them what they need.' i thought i had what i wanted, but learning the teachings of swami rama from shanon was the gentle slip of what i didn't even know i needed. at any rate, in my last class at this particular studio, the teacher said that yoga is like aerobics. i couldn't have disagreed more. i grabbed my mat, left the class, and never went back to that studio again. and so, i followed hilly and ben to wherever they went. it was an enormous relief, and i just felt at home on my mat in their classes. i felt rested, calm, and just warm and happy all over. the second class i left, the teacher was playing top 40 music so damn loud i couldn't even hear her or my breath, and she was moving the class along so quickly i just got pissed off - i grabbed my mat and left, and i have never been back to her class.
now, don't get me wrong - everyone likes different things, and different things work for different people. i'm sure there are some that don't like to practice how i like to practice - and that's fine. we all have our different opinions. we all have an interpretation of what yoga is, and we take on what feels right within. but if you are in a yoga class you don't like, is it rude to leave? i don't think it is. if i were teaching (which i chose not to pursue) i honestly don't think i'd be offended if someone chose to leave because i have left yoga classes before i wasn't digging, and if someone wasn't digging mine i'd respect their decision to leave.
this is a good article i came across this morning - the timing was quite ironic because i came close to leaving my third class last night. good read.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/05/02/308953037/when-a-yoga-teacher-ticks-you-off-is-it-rude-to-walk-out
Friday, May 16, 2014
Monday, May 12, 2014
to zoo, or not to zoo
so, i just got back from a trip to dallas to see the family. my little brother came into town from california, and we don't get to see him that often. it's been a rough few weeks at work and otherwise, so it's always good to go home, check in, and recharge my batteries.
on friday my parents, myself, and aren took my two and a half year old nephew to the zoo. simon loves, love, LOVES the zoo and is crazy about animals - he can identify so many animals when you show him pictures and able to make the sound they make, and is so curious to learn more about them. he's kinda awesome that way. and most of simon's love and awareness of animals have come from aren, his family, and his teachers teaching him about animals and him seeing them in person (i.e., toby, his dad's dogs, my parents cats, the zoo).
as someone who loves animals and think they all should be treated as equals, as a vegan and someone who wants to reduce and end all animal suffering, i hate zoos and the caging and enclosing of animals. however, as someone who loves animals, i also feel strongly connected to them. i think this is crucial in others starting to feel how i feel, and educating themselves on the unfair treatment upon a lot of animals - they need to feel connected to them to care, and spending time with them and experiencing them helps to build this connectivity. and so, i'm at an impasse.
i haven't been to the zoo in a while, and i honestly do not like to go. and to add to that, zoos and sanctuaries are completely different to me. sanctuaries house 100% rescued wildlife. for example, the sanctuary we went to in alaska had wildlife that were all rescues - some they were holding through the winter to be released in the spring, others were permanent residents (those who were orphaned or injured). their 'enclosures', if i can even call them that, were HUGE - like, they had acres upon acres of tons of space for the animals to meander about. they were hardly comparable to then tiny zoo enclosures. there also were only a few people there when we went as opposed to thousands of screaming children banging on the glass and yelling at the animals at the zoo. so, to me at least, these two aren't comparable.
the animals at the zoo break my heart - i could've easily cried a couple times friday when we were there. the cages for some of these animals were hardly sufficient for their size. sure, some of these animals are rescues, but some of them aren't - some of them are kidnapped and taken to zoos to our pleasure and enjoyment. screaming and growling children swarm their cages banging on the glass, pulling on nets - if i was one of those animals i'd just be so depressed. and animals aren't stupid, people - they feel emotion, they feel stress and anger, they feel what we feel. but, again, i'm at an impasse.
zoos and sanctuaries are pretty much that people can see wildlife in person. and to see, is to believe. seeing grows awareness. seeing rids yourself of some ignorance surrounding wildlife. reading the placards about a certain animal being endangered. and what we can do to help them educates us. seeing them, feeling them, raising our awareness, and building our education helps people feel connected and feeling connected makes us give a damn about them. it makes us feel sad for them, it makes us want to help. for example, almost 60% of vegans became vegan after either a) watching videos of a factory farm and slaughterhouse, or b) growing a friendship with a typical farm animal (ex., more and more people are getting pigs as pets and they no longer eat pork or bacon). i started caring more about wildlife when i volunteered at wildlife rescue - it made me feel connected in a way that i wouldn't if i hadn't had that experience. my mom volunteered and did something with gorillas at the dallas zoo when i was little, and she grew to care about them as a species. marine biologists, zoo keepers, zoologists, veterinarians, etc. care GREATLY for the animals they tend to - they treat them as equals, as friends, as children.
on friday my parents, myself, and aren took my two and a half year old nephew to the zoo. simon loves, love, LOVES the zoo and is crazy about animals - he can identify so many animals when you show him pictures and able to make the sound they make, and is so curious to learn more about them. he's kinda awesome that way. and most of simon's love and awareness of animals have come from aren, his family, and his teachers teaching him about animals and him seeing them in person (i.e., toby, his dad's dogs, my parents cats, the zoo).
as someone who loves animals and think they all should be treated as equals, as a vegan and someone who wants to reduce and end all animal suffering, i hate zoos and the caging and enclosing of animals. however, as someone who loves animals, i also feel strongly connected to them. i think this is crucial in others starting to feel how i feel, and educating themselves on the unfair treatment upon a lot of animals - they need to feel connected to them to care, and spending time with them and experiencing them helps to build this connectivity. and so, i'm at an impasse.
i haven't been to the zoo in a while, and i honestly do not like to go. and to add to that, zoos and sanctuaries are completely different to me. sanctuaries house 100% rescued wildlife. for example, the sanctuary we went to in alaska had wildlife that were all rescues - some they were holding through the winter to be released in the spring, others were permanent residents (those who were orphaned or injured). their 'enclosures', if i can even call them that, were HUGE - like, they had acres upon acres of tons of space for the animals to meander about. they were hardly comparable to then tiny zoo enclosures. there also were only a few people there when we went as opposed to thousands of screaming children banging on the glass and yelling at the animals at the zoo. so, to me at least, these two aren't comparable.
the animals at the zoo break my heart - i could've easily cried a couple times friday when we were there. the cages for some of these animals were hardly sufficient for their size. sure, some of these animals are rescues, but some of them aren't - some of them are kidnapped and taken to zoos to our pleasure and enjoyment. screaming and growling children swarm their cages banging on the glass, pulling on nets - if i was one of those animals i'd just be so depressed. and animals aren't stupid, people - they feel emotion, they feel stress and anger, they feel what we feel. but, again, i'm at an impasse.
zoos and sanctuaries are pretty much that people can see wildlife in person. and to see, is to believe. seeing grows awareness. seeing rids yourself of some ignorance surrounding wildlife. reading the placards about a certain animal being endangered. and what we can do to help them educates us. seeing them, feeling them, raising our awareness, and building our education helps people feel connected and feeling connected makes us give a damn about them. it makes us feel sad for them, it makes us want to help. for example, almost 60% of vegans became vegan after either a) watching videos of a factory farm and slaughterhouse, or b) growing a friendship with a typical farm animal (ex., more and more people are getting pigs as pets and they no longer eat pork or bacon). i started caring more about wildlife when i volunteered at wildlife rescue - it made me feel connected in a way that i wouldn't if i hadn't had that experience. my mom volunteered and did something with gorillas at the dallas zoo when i was little, and she grew to care about them as a species. marine biologists, zoo keepers, zoologists, veterinarians, etc. care GREATLY for the animals they tend to - they treat them as equals, as friends, as children.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
a ticking clock
i got toby when i was in rehab when i was 19 years old. that's right, i was in rehab. did y'all know that? i had a nasty eating disorder when i was younger, and it took me far away to rehab when i was newly 19. i went to inpatient in arizona for 30 days. i thought after that i'd be done, back home and cured for good - shit, was i was wrong. after arizona, i went to florida for four months for out-patient... and that's where i found my toby.
i was lonely in treatment, needless to say. treatment is a horribly scary, lonely place. and the further into treatment i got, the lonelier i became. my out-patient facility in florida encouraged 'pet therapy'. and i thought to myself, 'sweet!! i can get a dog like i've always wanted!' it sounded easy enough, but it wasn't. the delray beach/boca raton area is a HUGE rehab community. when i walked into the first pet adoption place i felt judged - they took one look at me and my friend, and did not want to place an animal into my care. and looking back on it now, in their defense, rightfully so. i was 19. i was unstable and in rehab, for god's sake. and so, i ended up at puppy palace - a puppy store, that i'm sure now gets all there dogs from puppy mills. god forgive me!!
i wanted to adopt, but i was denied. i was crushed. but i wanted a damn dog to love on, and nothing was going to stop me. i took my roommate and best rehab friend lindsay with me to puppy palace - i had no idea what kind of dog i was looking for. the place had kiddy pools surrounded by fencing filled with puppies. i walked from pool to pool, and finally walked up to this one that was in the middle. there were so many puppies jumping around, crawling on each other, yipping and yapping, and there was one dead asleep on his back in the middle of the pool unaware of anything that was around him (he is now my toby).
i walked up to the pool. all these puppies walked up to me and lindsay, jumping up begging us to take them home. but i had my eye on this one weird little guy dead asleep, motionless in the middle of the pool. i swear to god, the second i was against the pool that damn puppy woke up, stood up and shook off, and ran over to me and jumped up. he looked at me with his little brown eyes and that was it - i was done for. and that little ball of fluff is now my toby.
i picked him up, and tears came to my eyes. he had a little hospital bracelet around his neck (they all did) with his birthday, price (gulp), and breed. i didn't know what the hell a shiba inu was, but what did i care - this dog and i were in love and i was going to take him home. i carried him to the front, wrote a check, and lindsay and i took him home.
i never grew up with a dog - i grew up with cats. and all of a sudden i was in rehab with an 8 week old puppy. i had no idea what to name him - how do you name a pet?? so lindsay and i got online, and pulled up a list of common dog names and we literally started from the letter 'a' and called to toby each name that caught my eye down the list. we were sitting at our dining room table, i called 'toby', and that little guy came running and jumped up on me. and so was the beginning of the relationship we have today.
toby is now 12 years old. well, he's over 12 years old actually - in fact, he turned 12 on february 16 of this year. i'm 31, and i got him when i was 19. we've been together through everything - and i mean, everything. he's been with me through hurt, heartache, happiness, every time i've cried, every time i've laughed, moved, fought, screamed, through every roommate, relationship, breakup, loss, victory... i mean, everything.
when toby turned 10, he hit the double-digits - his immortality was just so imminent all of a sudden. i hated it. and this last year, he had surgery - we had to have a tumor removed. the tumor was benign, and apparently very common among 'older' dogs, but it sucked. i had to drop him off one morning, and wait for them to be done to pick him up the next day. when i dropped him off, i cried. when i went home from work that day and he wasn't there, i couldn't help but think to myself, 'is this what it's going to be like when he dies? i'm going to get home? and it's going to be quiet? and still? and alone?' i couldn't take it. i called the vet the next morning to check on toby. he made it through surgery, and i was counting the hours 'til i could pick him up. i cried when i dropped him off, and i cried when i picked him up. and he was happy when i picked him up - he was freaking out!! if he was so happy, how could i be crying? and how the hell was i going to handle it if i ever had to go to the vet with him and not leave with him?
toby is happy and healthy and insanely energetic for a 12 year old dog... but i think about it. his face is getting whiter. he's slowing down. he sleeps more. he has that sagging 'old dog tummy'. and let's face it, he will leave me one day. i pray and pray that i won't be in the position i will have to put him down. sometimes i've, ahem, gotten drunk and put him in a headlock pleading to him, 'toby, when it is your time, please just go on your own. please don't put me in the position that i'll have to put you down because i don't know if i'll be strong enough.'
it may sound morbid to think about, i know - but i sometimes think about what it's going to be like when he isn't here anymore. most days i don't think about it, but some days (like today) i look at him with love and appreciation, and i think of what it is going to be like without him.
i think that throughout out lifetime, we are each blessed with a few select soulmates - and toby is one of mine. i am confident that i would not be where i am today without him. he came into my life at a time when i needed him most, and he saved me. my dog toby honestly saved me. he gave me something to live for, to love. he needed me and love me unconditionally. he looked at me like i could do not wrong. whenever i was upset or hurt or lost, i looked at him and i was calm. i know that toby will always be with me, no matter what happens or what may come between us - he is my angel.
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
He's Just Not That Into You (a reflection on the movie)
I’ve watched this movie so many times, it is saved on my DVR
to watch at my leisure, and whenever it is on TV I will stop what I’m doing to
watch it. Have you ever been watching TV
and you’re, like, so embarrassed for one of the characters you kinda shield
your eyes when they do something stupid?
I’m like that with Gigi in this movie.
That girl, that girl, that girl… But, I digress…
In this movie, they go over some very valid points and
lessons of dating, all of which are true. Gigi also mentions that these are the 'rule's, and rarely are there 'exception' - hence the token phrase, 'the exception, not the rule' I’ve encountered most of them personally, especially over the last years
and the array of guys I’ve gone out with (I swear, I’ve had more first and
second dates these last three years than I care to count), but have also witness them with my friends over the years. I’ve given advice to a couple friends
recently about some of this stuff. These
lessons are in a fictional movie, but every single one of them is true. They are as follows, and apply to girls and
guys (so kinda ignore the pronouns):
‘He’s not asking you out.
Because trust me, if he likes you, he’ll ask you out.’
This idea seems plain
and simple enough, but it’s not well received.
When you like someone and they don’t ask you out, they don’t like you –
plain and simple. When we really like
someone we can convince ourselves they like us too, when they really don’t. And then we’ll try and come up with some
reason they aren’t asking us out – they’re scared, I make them nervous, I’m
intimidating, etc. But when someone is interested, they’ll ask you out or at least
make it known they’re interested. If they
don’t ask you out, they aren’t interested.
**Sidenote: Be cognizant of ‘being on the hook’. This means that you are someone’s back-up. They flirt with you, kinda keep you around,
and kinda want to make sure you’re interested just in case someone else doesn’t
pan out. This sounds horrible, but admit
it – most of us have done it. I’m
ashamed to admit it, but I’ve done it. Someone
may flirt with you, send you cute texts, whatever, but if they aren’t asking
you out, you are ‘on the hook.’
‘He’s not calling (or texting these days) – men know how to
use the phone.’
One thing I’ve learned
after all the first and second dates I’ve been on the last three years is that
not all first dates will lead to a second, not all second dates will lead to a
third, and so on. Feelings change – as much as you are attracted to the other
person, how much y’all flirt, how much you think it is gonna work out, chances
are it won’t. Sometimes I’ve gone on a
first date with someone I ‘have a good feeling about’, and then during the date
I think to myself, ‘what the hell was I thinking??’ You build something up so big in your mind, and then wonder what the hell happened when you realize it isn't so. Or I’ve gone out with someone I’ve known for
a while, and then I realize we’re best as friends – and in these instances, get
out fast – otherwise, you run the risk of losing that friendship.
If they don’t call or
text you anymore, or start to ‘phase you out’, they aren’t interested. If they want to go out with you again, they
will ask you out again, and ideally make plans at the end of the previous date
(when they do this, they are REALLY interested). And if someone doesn’t want to see you again, of course it’s preferable if they just say, ‘Look – I’m just not feeling it.’ Unfortunately this doesn’t always
happen. I think the most common method
is the ‘phase out’. We always think it’s
shitty when someone phases us out, but admit it – you’ve done it yourself. It’s the easier, non-confrontational route. I’ve told a guy ‘I’m just not feeling it’,
but I’ve also done the phase out. You begin
to become shorter in your text replies. You
start to become more indifferent than you were before. You try and put them in the 'friendzone'. Then you don’t reply right away, maybe miss a
text of two and don’t respond on purpose hoping they’ll get the hint, but
eventually the other party should get it.
If they don’t, then you can’t really help them at that point, and you
gotta be blunt and spell it out.
‘He’s not dating you – I’m not ready for a relationship
means he’s not ready for a relationship with you.’
I have a friend who
recently went through something like this.
He went out with this girl a few times and he really liked her – he thought
they were going to have this long-term relationship, she was throwing him all
the signs, he was falling for her, she told him at one point she felt the same
way, etc. As things started to get more
serious, she told him that she wasn’t ready for a relationship, had a lot of
family drama going on at the moment, etc.
When I told him the cold hard truth, he said, ‘Maybe she does just have
a lot going on right now. She’s said she
wants the same thing, she said we’re on the same page. Maybe she really isn’t ready right now. But she REALLY likes me - SHE TOLD ME SO!’ He was trying to find excuses and didn’t want
to admit that she just didn’t want to be with him.
No. People, when someone tells you this, it’s
bullshit. It’s not that they aren’t ‘ready
for a relationship’, they just don’t want a relationship with you. When you hear this from someone you’ve grown
to really like, it stings, sure – you just gotta recognize the truth and walk
it off. And surprise surprise, this girl
was in a relationship with another guy almost immediately after she started to
phase my friend out. He was confused,
then started analyzing every little thing that had happened, wondered ‘why’, what
did he do wrong, and what did this guy have that he didn’t. She just liked him more than she liked
you. It’s hard to hear and accept, but
that’s just how it is.
Not matter what is
going on in someone’s life, if they really like you, they will make it
happen. I don’t care what’s going on in life, if someone is recently divorced, if someone has an illness in the family,
etc. – if they like you, they will be with you.
As much as I hate to admit it, I’ve made excuses too. I’ve told a few people that I had a lot going on right
now, I just wanted to focus on my running, I wasn’t ready, I didn’t want to
date right now, etc. But truth of the matter
is, I just didn’t want to be in a relationship with them.
‘He only wants to see you when he’s drunk.’
He thinks of you as a
booty call, nothing more. That’s all I have
to say about that one. Don’t even
pretend otherwise.
‘He’s breaking up with you – I don’t want to go out with you
means just that.’
Uh, yea. And I can reference the
point before the last one (he’s not dating you). Lots of times someone will break up with you
and use the line, ‘I’m just not ready for this yet. I have a lot going on right now. You deserve more than me. I’m so envious of the person that ends up
with you.’ No – they’re not interested
anymore, don’t feed into the bullshit, walk it off, move on. Not all relationships will last, not all
relationships are meant to be long-term.
You learn more about a person the more time you spend with them, and
oftentimes you learn stuff you don’t like.
It happens.
I’ve had friends over the years that find themselves in a relationship
for the sake of being in a relationship, or in a marriage for the sake of being in a marriage.
All of their friends are married, engaged, or in a serious
relationship. You meet someone, like
them okay, so it seems like a good idea at the time. But you fight all the time. They get on your nerves. Every little thing they do begins to drive
you crazy. But it’s comfortable,
convenient, etc. Folks, cut your losses
and get out. I’ve been stuck in a
relationship like this before, and it’s miserable. We stayed together for financial convenience,
we were comfortable around each other, we shared furniture and splitting
everything up seemed like such a pain in the ass, and we shared the same
friends. Then one night over lasagna, we
were just like, ‘what the hell are we doing?’
So, we split up. We got over
it. And now we are such good friends. I recognize that the longer someone has been
together, the harder this will be (there might be kids involved, financial ties, property, etc.). But it’s always better for all involved to
end things, and then after time, you will feel a tremendous weight off your
shoulders (hopefully).
On another note, if you don’t like how a person is EXACTLY how they
are, don’t get in or stay in a relationship thinking, a) you can change
them, or b) they will change on their own, or c) ‘but they’re really hot’. We are how we are, and if someone doesn’t
like it (preferable adore it), they aren’t the one for you. If
you fool yourself into thinking this, and/or ignore any red flags, it’s going
to end and most likely won’t end well.
DON’T DO IT! And ladies, don’t
let a big diamond and money and a big wedding fool you into thinking someone is
who they aren’t. And people (mostly men –
sorry, but it’s true), do NOT go after someone or most importantly stay with
someone based on looks and sex alone.
Attraction and sex are important, yes, but if lust is all you have, what
do you have at the end of the day to come home to? Looks fade, but laughter and love can last
forever – choose someone who challenges you, makes you want to be a better
person, someone you can laugh and play with, someone you can converse openly
and honestly with, someone who gets you and someone you get, and someone you
genuinely enjoy spending time with.
I have friends that come to me for
love and relationship advice all the time, and sometimes I don’t get why – I’m
not in a relationship, have been single for three years, and seem to have been
a serial dater during this time. But I guess
I give good advice, or so I’ve been told – I’m the ‘go to girl’ for relationship
advice for a couple of my close friends.
It’s kinda flattering, to be honest.
All the time people ask me why I’ve been single for so long – how is it
that I haven’t met someone yet? Well, I’m
so happy with where and who I am right now.
I love my life, and have never been happier. So, yea, I’ve dated a lot but I haven’t met
anyone worth my time or met someone I want to invite into my life. When I meet them, I’ll know it. It just hasn’t happened yet, and I am not
going to settle.
I’ve seen what happens when you
settle, and I’m not about to find myself in some miserable relationship and full of regret years later. I’ve seen what happens when someone places
their personal happiness contingent on someone else, and this never ends well –
and if you aren’t fully happy just being you, you don’t have much to offer a
healthy relationship. I also always go
with my gut – if I get any red flags or have a feeling like something isn’t
right, I’m out right away. My parents got engaged
two weeks after they met – two weeks!! That
seems ludicrous – who does that? I’ve asked my mom before, ‘why would you say ‘yes’
to a guy you just met?’ And her answer
was simple – she knew in her gut that my Daddy was the one for her. I’ve asked my Daddy why he would propose to a
woman he just met, and he said the same thing, and then told me that once you
know someone is the one, you want to start the rest of your life right
away. Awww, how cute J All their friends thought they were crazy
(and I think they were nuts), and they’ve even told me if I do something like
that I’m in trouble (hypocrites, but chances are I won’t), but they just
celebrated their 37th wedding anniversary and are incredibly happy
after all that time. That is
remarkable.
And I’ll part with a few closing
words… Recognize what’s right in front of you – if they aren’t calling or
texting or asking you out, they aren’t’ interested. Cut your losses as soon as you know something
isn’t right, walk it off, and move on.
First dates don’t always result in some long-lasting and meaningful
relationship – dating is about playing the field, and trial and error. Sometimes friendships turn into relationships,
and relationships turn into friendships – open your eyes to what is right in
front of you. Be honest with yourself,
and with others. And most importantly,
go with your gut – your gut does not lie.
Sunday, March 23, 2014
do vegans swallow??
i came across this article on elephant journal, and it kinda got me thinking about some stuff and reflecting upon a decision that i have made myself since making the move to veganism.
last year after i made the move to being a full time vegan, i went to a nutritionist. i knew my parents would be a bit more appeased if i were to go, i wanted to make sure i was still getting all the protein and amino acids i need (especially with me being a runner), and i wanted to trim up a bit. on my first visit, carly asked if i would be open to eating any animal protein at all. chicken? no. fish? no. whey protein powder? no. eggs? hmm... interesting concept... eggs. i told her i was open to it under a couple very important circumstances. first of all, only if the chickens were on a private 'farm' type of setting or on a large piece of land that they could roam free. second of all, if the owner did not slaughter or sell them for slaughter. and third of all, if the owner treated them no different than they did their domestic pet. i also talked to a few vegetarians and vegans about the idea, and the ones i talked to were surprisingly supportive of the idea as well.
and so i went on the search. carly told me about this farm in town, i forget the name. the chickens do have a ton of room to run around. these chickens have an excellent quality of life, well taken care of by the family and staff that runs the farm, and have open access to huge open fields. so i called them to learn more, and to find out if they slaughter. the chickens did appear to have an amazing quality of life, but once their hens stop producing, off with their heads. they are 'humanely' killed and processed, and the meat is frozen and sent to starving families in africa. while i think it is admirable to do so much to help the hungry, i do not believe in the killing an animal just because they are not financially viable to you anymore. they also raised chickens and turkeys for meat and to be, once again, 'humanely' slaughtered. their website even had special advertisements around thanksgiving. so, this farm was out. i will not spend my money on and promote an organization that slaughters.
so then i went on the search to find a person who had chickens, and met the requirements i had. i talked to several people, all of which had chickens running around their backyard, but only had a few hens that produced just enough eggs for them. i was hitting dead end after dead end. and then i was told about a woman with my running group who had chickens and supplied many runners at rogue with their eggs.
stephanie and her family live on a large piece of land in dripping springs. she has several farm animals, some of which are rescues. she also has a lot of chickens that produce eggs not just for her family, but enough for a lot of other people as well. stephanie herself is mostly vegetarian. when i talked to her about her chickens, she referred to them as her 'babies'. she doesn't treat them (or any of her other animals) any different than we treat our dogs or cats, in fact she treats them better than i'm sure many dogs and cats are treated. the more i talked to her, and the more i did research on the biological process of hens laying eggs, i was comfortable eating the eggs.
there are some that think eggs are aborted fetuses. how dare we eat them? we are eating the potential of life, and preventing a life that was to be. why would we abort these baby chickens, fry them up, and eat them alongside bacon? it was horrible, reprehensible. and i admit i used to assume the same, but then when i did more research (and it was quite extensive, including talking to a vet), i learned i was wrong.
the eggs chickens lay are unfertilized eggs. the act of chickens laying eggs is basically no different than us getting our period or other mammals going into heat. we get our period every month, in short, because we didn't get pregnant. but then when our eggs are fertilized, we don't get our period for 9 or 10 months while we are growing this baby. chickens carry the same principle. chickens still lay the eggs, but instead they sit on them until they hatch. when you crack these eggs, even early in the process, the inside looks much different than the unfertilized ones. when you have roosters running around with hens, there will be some eggs around that are fertilized. just like our society in which you have men and women running around having sex, some pregnancies will result but if you don't allow a rooster to have access to them (just like if we were to restrain from sex), all eggs they lay will be unfertilized and safe for us to eat.
now some vegetarians/vegans may come in with this argument, and i've heard it before - but those eggs are the possibility of life. and then you kinda need to make sure those proposing this principle are pro-life. an aborted human fetus is also the possibility of life. so unless they are strongly pro-life, one could conclude their argument is invalid because we view animals as equals as us humans. so then if i am confronted by a vegetarian/vegan who is pro-choice, i have another argument. we have our periods because we don't get pregnant. i hate to get graphic, but what we shed and expel is basically the potential of life. what a man, um, expels is also the possibility of life. so is every emission that doesn't result in a pregnancy considered murder or, as elle woods in legally blonde claims, reckless abandonment? and i could go on. people that find oral sex offensive, shield your eyes from the rest of the paragraph. this is also the alluded idea in the elephant journal article (hence the title, 'do vegans swallow?'). this emission of a man's, um, capabilities results from oral sex. ladies, if you choose to swallow this, is this cannibalism? after all, all the little swimmers are the possibility of life. if we are swallowing them, therefore not allowing them to seek an egg, are we committing murder? and this is commonplace among the sexually active, including the vegan/vegetarian community.
no, we obviously are not. this sexual practice is not murder. having our periods every month is not the reprehensible denial of a life that could be. the sperm never sought an egg, and in the situation of abstinence, never had the possibility. our egg was never fertilized. same principle with hens, but their eggs are exceptionally more edible than us women's. this is the same principle. the hens are going to lay their unfertilized eggs, whether we choose to eat them or not. it is a hen's body's natural body process, just like us. if they are not eaten, they go bad and are then no longer of any use at all. since a rooster did not have access to them, in my eyes us not having sex, those eggs are all going to be unfertilized, just as ours are going to be if we do not have sex or if sex does not result in a pregnancy.
i was watching the documentary vegucated (which i recommend to you), and one of the ladies in the film said something that rang true to me. veganism is not some religion or cult, it is simply about the reduction and end of suffering. and to me that's what it is. i choose to not eat the flesh of animals. i choose to not eat dairy. forcing the lactation of a cow that is not nursing her own calf is not a natural body process, just as forcing my lactation for anyone other than my baby is not a natural body process. and if she is nursing her own calf, i'm not going to take that milk from her baby. i wouldn't want someone to take my milk for someone else. forcing lactation causes stress on the cow, stress on her body, is not a natural biological process, and the stress can even cause her life to be shorter than it would otherwise. but i fall short on a reason to not eat the eggs under the circumstances and for the reasons noted above.
there was another interesting point brought up by the article. since us vegans are vehemently against corporate farming and the raising of animals for slaughter, and if we were all vegan, would there be farm animals at all? would they become endangered or extinct? should we not have cows and chickens and pigs and goats and lambs and sheep? i don't necessarily think so, but we'd have far less for damn sure. we would not force these animals to continually be pregnant, only to take their babies to kill them just like their parents' demise. instead we would have them in the sense i have toby. i've had a few friends over the years with a pet pig.
i've read a lot about sanctuaries that rescue farm animals, largely from these huge abusive corporate farms. these sanctuaries save these animals, nurse them back to health, rid them of the trauma, raise them, and let them carry on the remainder of their now happy lives. these animals are literally smiling - i've seen it. they are so happy and fulfilled it brings tears to my eyes. these animals are treated no different than we treat our dogs and cats. and to me, these sanctuaries are no different than dog or cat rescues - they take orphaned or abused animals to take care of and/or to place in happy and healthy homes. one day i would love to live outside of town and have lots of land to do the same - i want to rescue all the animals that i can. i want to take care of an orphaned calf whose mother may have been killed for hamburger meat, and was perhaps to be sold for veal. i want to rescue a few pigs that were about to be electrocuted. i want to take chickens who can barely walk because their bodies grew too big too fast from all the hormones they were pumped with, their legs can't hold their own body weight, nurse them back to health, make them strong, and let them live out the rest of their life happy. i want to rescue orphaned lambs on their way to the slaughterhouse. saving these animals and affecting their quality of life would give me so much joy. making a difference, no matter how small, would bring a permanent smile to my face. would i allow them to breed? not unless it happens naturally, just as we become pregnant naturally. here are some of these amazing places if you want to check them out.
last year after i made the move to being a full time vegan, i went to a nutritionist. i knew my parents would be a bit more appeased if i were to go, i wanted to make sure i was still getting all the protein and amino acids i need (especially with me being a runner), and i wanted to trim up a bit. on my first visit, carly asked if i would be open to eating any animal protein at all. chicken? no. fish? no. whey protein powder? no. eggs? hmm... interesting concept... eggs. i told her i was open to it under a couple very important circumstances. first of all, only if the chickens were on a private 'farm' type of setting or on a large piece of land that they could roam free. second of all, if the owner did not slaughter or sell them for slaughter. and third of all, if the owner treated them no different than they did their domestic pet. i also talked to a few vegetarians and vegans about the idea, and the ones i talked to were surprisingly supportive of the idea as well.
and so i went on the search. carly told me about this farm in town, i forget the name. the chickens do have a ton of room to run around. these chickens have an excellent quality of life, well taken care of by the family and staff that runs the farm, and have open access to huge open fields. so i called them to learn more, and to find out if they slaughter. the chickens did appear to have an amazing quality of life, but once their hens stop producing, off with their heads. they are 'humanely' killed and processed, and the meat is frozen and sent to starving families in africa. while i think it is admirable to do so much to help the hungry, i do not believe in the killing an animal just because they are not financially viable to you anymore. they also raised chickens and turkeys for meat and to be, once again, 'humanely' slaughtered. their website even had special advertisements around thanksgiving. so, this farm was out. i will not spend my money on and promote an organization that slaughters.
so then i went on the search to find a person who had chickens, and met the requirements i had. i talked to several people, all of which had chickens running around their backyard, but only had a few hens that produced just enough eggs for them. i was hitting dead end after dead end. and then i was told about a woman with my running group who had chickens and supplied many runners at rogue with their eggs.
stephanie and her family live on a large piece of land in dripping springs. she has several farm animals, some of which are rescues. she also has a lot of chickens that produce eggs not just for her family, but enough for a lot of other people as well. stephanie herself is mostly vegetarian. when i talked to her about her chickens, she referred to them as her 'babies'. she doesn't treat them (or any of her other animals) any different than we treat our dogs or cats, in fact she treats them better than i'm sure many dogs and cats are treated. the more i talked to her, and the more i did research on the biological process of hens laying eggs, i was comfortable eating the eggs.
there are some that think eggs are aborted fetuses. how dare we eat them? we are eating the potential of life, and preventing a life that was to be. why would we abort these baby chickens, fry them up, and eat them alongside bacon? it was horrible, reprehensible. and i admit i used to assume the same, but then when i did more research (and it was quite extensive, including talking to a vet), i learned i was wrong.
the eggs chickens lay are unfertilized eggs. the act of chickens laying eggs is basically no different than us getting our period or other mammals going into heat. we get our period every month, in short, because we didn't get pregnant. but then when our eggs are fertilized, we don't get our period for 9 or 10 months while we are growing this baby. chickens carry the same principle. chickens still lay the eggs, but instead they sit on them until they hatch. when you crack these eggs, even early in the process, the inside looks much different than the unfertilized ones. when you have roosters running around with hens, there will be some eggs around that are fertilized. just like our society in which you have men and women running around having sex, some pregnancies will result but if you don't allow a rooster to have access to them (just like if we were to restrain from sex), all eggs they lay will be unfertilized and safe for us to eat.
now some vegetarians/vegans may come in with this argument, and i've heard it before - but those eggs are the possibility of life. and then you kinda need to make sure those proposing this principle are pro-life. an aborted human fetus is also the possibility of life. so unless they are strongly pro-life, one could conclude their argument is invalid because we view animals as equals as us humans. so then if i am confronted by a vegetarian/vegan who is pro-choice, i have another argument. we have our periods because we don't get pregnant. i hate to get graphic, but what we shed and expel is basically the potential of life. what a man, um, expels is also the possibility of life. so is every emission that doesn't result in a pregnancy considered murder or, as elle woods in legally blonde claims, reckless abandonment? and i could go on. people that find oral sex offensive, shield your eyes from the rest of the paragraph. this is also the alluded idea in the elephant journal article (hence the title, 'do vegans swallow?'). this emission of a man's, um, capabilities results from oral sex. ladies, if you choose to swallow this, is this cannibalism? after all, all the little swimmers are the possibility of life. if we are swallowing them, therefore not allowing them to seek an egg, are we committing murder? and this is commonplace among the sexually active, including the vegan/vegetarian community.
no, we obviously are not. this sexual practice is not murder. having our periods every month is not the reprehensible denial of a life that could be. the sperm never sought an egg, and in the situation of abstinence, never had the possibility. our egg was never fertilized. same principle with hens, but their eggs are exceptionally more edible than us women's. this is the same principle. the hens are going to lay their unfertilized eggs, whether we choose to eat them or not. it is a hen's body's natural body process, just like us. if they are not eaten, they go bad and are then no longer of any use at all. since a rooster did not have access to them, in my eyes us not having sex, those eggs are all going to be unfertilized, just as ours are going to be if we do not have sex or if sex does not result in a pregnancy.
i was watching the documentary vegucated (which i recommend to you), and one of the ladies in the film said something that rang true to me. veganism is not some religion or cult, it is simply about the reduction and end of suffering. and to me that's what it is. i choose to not eat the flesh of animals. i choose to not eat dairy. forcing the lactation of a cow that is not nursing her own calf is not a natural body process, just as forcing my lactation for anyone other than my baby is not a natural body process. and if she is nursing her own calf, i'm not going to take that milk from her baby. i wouldn't want someone to take my milk for someone else. forcing lactation causes stress on the cow, stress on her body, is not a natural biological process, and the stress can even cause her life to be shorter than it would otherwise. but i fall short on a reason to not eat the eggs under the circumstances and for the reasons noted above.
there was another interesting point brought up by the article. since us vegans are vehemently against corporate farming and the raising of animals for slaughter, and if we were all vegan, would there be farm animals at all? would they become endangered or extinct? should we not have cows and chickens and pigs and goats and lambs and sheep? i don't necessarily think so, but we'd have far less for damn sure. we would not force these animals to continually be pregnant, only to take their babies to kill them just like their parents' demise. instead we would have them in the sense i have toby. i've had a few friends over the years with a pet pig.
i've read a lot about sanctuaries that rescue farm animals, largely from these huge abusive corporate farms. these sanctuaries save these animals, nurse them back to health, rid them of the trauma, raise them, and let them carry on the remainder of their now happy lives. these animals are literally smiling - i've seen it. they are so happy and fulfilled it brings tears to my eyes. these animals are treated no different than we treat our dogs and cats. and to me, these sanctuaries are no different than dog or cat rescues - they take orphaned or abused animals to take care of and/or to place in happy and healthy homes. one day i would love to live outside of town and have lots of land to do the same - i want to rescue all the animals that i can. i want to take care of an orphaned calf whose mother may have been killed for hamburger meat, and was perhaps to be sold for veal. i want to rescue a few pigs that were about to be electrocuted. i want to take chickens who can barely walk because their bodies grew too big too fast from all the hormones they were pumped with, their legs can't hold their own body weight, nurse them back to health, make them strong, and let them live out the rest of their life happy. i want to rescue orphaned lambs on their way to the slaughterhouse. saving these animals and affecting their quality of life would give me so much joy. making a difference, no matter how small, would bring a permanent smile to my face. would i allow them to breed? not unless it happens naturally, just as we become pregnant naturally. here are some of these amazing places if you want to check them out.
http://www.gentlebarn.org/
http://www.farmsanctuary.org/
http://rockyridgerefuge.com/
Monday, March 10, 2014
eat and run
I read this book from start to finish while flying to
Alaska. Scott Jurek previously came out with
Born to Run, and then came out with Eat and Run – both books are awesome
reads, and not just for the running community.
Jurek grew up hunting and basically eating a meat and potato
diet – few vegetables, lots of meat, lots of dairy. He wasn’t that active when he was younger,
but started becoming more active when he was in high school by joining the ski
team, and then started running. He loved
running – started to get strong, started running more and more.
He began to tweak his diet by eating more vegetables, and slowly
started cutting back on meat and other animal products. He was shocked by how much better he felt – he
assumed he needed meat, needed animal protein, to be a strong and fast distance
runner. He was wrong – he found energy
and strength from holding a more plant-based diet. Over time, he found his way to veganism.
Jurek isn’t just a distance runner, he’s an ultra-marathoner. And not only is he an ultra-marathoner, he wins them, he sets records. He’s run dozens of ultras, and runs at least 100 miles a week. He’s fast, he’s strong.
Before finding my way to veganism, I ate healthy and clean. I ate a largely plant-based diet, but was eating meat and dairy on a regular basis. Last year I slowly cut out animal products, and have had a Vegan diet since the end of September – never felt better. I felt great before, and had no idea there was that much room to feel better than I did before. I have more energy. I’m sleeping better. My blood levels and vitals were stellar before, and now they’re even more so. Without offering too much information, I’ll just say my digestive system has never been more on point. I’m lighter, I’m leaner, I’m tighter, I’m stronger, I’m getting faster. The effects are astounding.
I get so many questions from people about my veganism – aren’t
you hungry all the time? But what do you
eat? How do you live without bacon? Aren’t you lethargic all the time? But how do you get your protein? I’m hungry a lot, yes – but no more so than
before. Running 30 to 50 miles a week
will make you hungry. I actually stay
full longer because I’m eating five times a day instead of three (as advised by
my nutritionist). And my plant-based
meals keep me full. And I eat lots of
stuff! I luckily grew up with a mom who
cooked lots of different kinds of food for us, and made sure we acquired a
taste for grains, veggies, and fruit. So,
I eat lots of food, all different kinds.
How do I live without bacon? Well,
that was actually one of the first meats I cut out. I was never a big ham and bacon person, and
once I discovered pigs are as intelligent as dogs, I threw that out the window
without looking back. And I’m not
lethargic all the time – in fact I’ve never had so much energy. And I get my protein from lots of
places. There are so many plants and
grains and legumes that are packed with protein that I think a lot of people
don’t realize. I have my struggles, sure
– but when I’m tempted, or feel myself craving milk chocolate, I think of the
reasons I became a vegan and the craving subsides.
People find their way to Veganism for different reasons – my
reasons are ethical and environmental, and the health benefits are a
bonus. Jurek became a vegan for the
sheer health benefits and how it affected his performance as an athlete – the ethical
and environmental reasons came a bit later, but he is still largely a vegan
because of the health benefits.
Last week I posted an interesting article on my Facebook
page about the rise of Veganism – check it out below:
There has been a significant spike in the popularity of
holding a plant-based diet as people discover the multitude of benefits is
holds – it is an easy way to affect your life, the world, and the lives of
animals. The US population of vegans has
more than doubled in the last three years.
The percentage of meat consumed by Americans is falling – we consumed
over 12% less meat in 2012 that we did five years prior. Wow! Those
are some awesome stats! Other than the
benefits for animals and the environment, think of the health benefits if we
continued to raise this awareness! Our children
would be more educated and healthy. We
would be healthier for future generations.
Fast food chains would be less. As
the demand for fresh produce would grow, we would see the rise of more private
and organic farms. I’m not trying to
force my agenda on someone, and not trying to be some militant vegan – but I would
like to be a part of the movement of educating others on the benefits of eating
a more plant-based diet. I’m not even
saying to become a Vegan. Just cutting
out meat of a few meals a week make a huge difference – to your health, to the
environment, and to the lives of animals.
This article also suggests documentaries cover
mostly the health benefits of a more plant-based diet. If you want to Netflix
some of the movies, I recommend Vegucated,
Forks over Knives (also a good book
that my dad actually wanted for Christmas), and Supersize Me. Vegucated is
quite entertaining - challenges big meat-eaters to maintain a vegan diet for
several weeks, and highlights some of the realistic challenges we face. Forks over Knives covers the benefits of
eating more of a plant-based diet. And Supersize
Me (went totally viral) follows a guy who eats only McDonalds for 30 days,
every meal, every drink, and covers the decline in health he faced over this
period of time. There are a few others
that have some grotesque footage and images of animals at slaughterhouses if
you’re interested in those, which I do encourage others to watch – but forewarning,
they are graphic and extremely hard to watch.
In fact, over 42% of vegans became vegan after watching a video like
these they are so powerful. Ignorance can
be bliss.
Eat and Run is a great book, article is
a good and quick read, and the documentaries listed are enlightening and
eye-opening.
That is all for now, Zoe signing off.
Monday, February 3, 2014
not-so-turkey chowder
it has been unseasonably
cold in austin this year - we've already had two (not one, but two) ice days
when we normally don't have any. in fact, before this year, the last time i
remember any ice hitting austin whatsoever was for my 24th birthday.
with all this cold, i've
been making a ton of soups for dinner. my mom used to make this turkey
chowder when i was growing up - she'd make it after the holidays with our
leftover turkey. my god it was good. and i found myself thinking
about it the other day... and i wanted to taste it! i found a great vegan
alternative in my forks over knives cookbook i made for dinner - it was
delicious and now flagged as one of my favorites.
**i made a couple changes
- sub'd green beans for the broccoli and cauliflower, and left out the dill
Lotsa Vegetable Chowder
Ingredients:
·
8
small Yukon Gold, white, or russet potatoes (about 2 pounds), cut into ½-inch
chunks
·
1⁄2 small
onion, peeled and chopped
·
3
ears fresh corn, kernels removed (about 1¾ cups), cobs reserved
·
2
medium carrots, peeled and diced
·
2
stalks of celery, chopped
·
1⁄4cup chopped red
bell pepper
·
1 cup
chopped broccoli and cauliflower stalks, outer fibrous parts removed and
discarded (about ½ pound)
·
1
clove garlic, peeled and minced
·
2
tablespoons chopped thyme
·
1⁄8 teaspoon
white pepper
·
2
teaspoons ground cumin
·
3
tablespoons chopped dill
·
Salt
to taste
In a
large pot, combine the potatoes, onion, corn kernels and cobs, carrots, celery,
pepper, broccoli and cauliflower, garlic, thyme, white pepper, cumin, and 6
cups water. Bring to a boil over high heat. Reduce the heat to medium-low and
simmer for 30 minutes, or until the vegetables are tender.
Remove
the corn cobs and let cool. Remove 1 cup of the soup and puree in a blender
with a tight-fitting lid, covered with a towel. (If you like a thicker soup,
puree 2 cups.) Return the pureed soup to the pot and add the dill. Scrape corn
cobs with back of a knife to remove the creamy corn bits from the kernel, and
add the bits to the pot. Stir well and season with salt.
http://www.forksoverknives.com/lotsa-vegetablechowder/?fb_action_ids=795357223811391&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=.Uu_8v6_0Bwc.like&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B574830235865608%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%22.Uu_8v6_0Bwc.like%22%5D
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









.jpg)



